Vitality

Related materials for this work

• Text Review 1993-04-30 · Chung Young-mok

  "Shin Jang-sik's Formal Method Concerning 'What Is Ours'" — Chung Young-mok review (1993)

  Details

  Text Review 1993-04-30 · Chung Young-mok

  "Shin Jang-sik's Formal Method Concerning 'What Is Ours'" — Chung Young-mok review (1993)

  Through several recent solo exhibitions, the unusual depth of Shin Jang-sik's attachment to "what is our own" has by now been openly stated. Even before any discussion of its formal accomplishment, the questions surrounding the artist—represented by the 〈Arirang〉 series—of "tradition and iconography" (Park Shin-ui, Choi Tae-man, Kim Young-jae), "Koreanness" (Seo Sung-rok), and "decorativeness" (Oh Byeong-uk) have been considered chiefly from the side of subject matter. Where the artist's intent is so directed, this orientation of interpretation is naturally to be expected. Moreover, the formal vision Shin embraces, which resonated with the fervor of "finding our own" around the time of the Olympics, has been positively received by many.

  Over the past several years, alongside the formal possibilities for a historical consciousness in the artist's work—especially in painting that includes the woodblock—critics have offered the following warm-eyed hopes for him. To begin with, Park Shin-ui, on the works in Shin's 1989 solo exhibition (To Gallery), noted that "the depth of symbolism is still shallow … the angle of interpretation upon the iconography is also not yet comprehensive." Choi Tae-man pointed out that his work "carries too strong a diagrammatic aspect" and raised the question of how much persuasive power such iconography could possess "within this modern social life of an industrial society." Kim Young-jae, reading the iconography of the same exhibition from the standpoint of language, gave a positive future-oriented appraisal: how far can the artist "shed everyday language" for a "meta-language or trans-language" as visual language—how effectively can he "express a world-language that is Korean"?

  On the works of last year's solo exhibition (Gallery Icon), Kang Sung-won found that the character of the artist's painting, including its iconography, "did not seem to depart greatly from the aesthetic dimension of an institutionalized traditionalism" and expressed hope that the artist would prioritize "the work of uncovering the true face" of traditionality and Koreanness, which has been refracted and occluded in many ways through the 1970s–80s. Finally, Seo Sung-rok stressed the necessity of a "more rugged, plain, simple, and naturally redolent formal apparatus" and of "a process of passing the subject through the filter of more genuinely folk forms."

  It is hardly the case that all of these essays correctly diagnosed the artist's problem, nor—even if they had—could they be the decisive elements forecasting or directing his future. To begin with, the abstractness of language is such that these critical texts can come across to the artist as too thinly concrete to translate into practice. With the exception of Kim Young-jae's linguistic vantage, most of the essays emphasized Koreanness and folk character through the iconography of the subject and the depth of its symbolism, leaving the impression that resolving these would carry the artist to his own formal advancement.

  Yet on the formal plane, I place my hope in Shin Jang-sik's plastic consciousness through the converse claim—that, in order to keep alive a genuine subject-consciousness of traditionality and Koreanness, the artist must in fact boldly cast off "what is his own" and "what is our own." That is to say, his consciousness of folk character and Koreanness, as it has appeared, should have been more deeply hidden formally; it should have been kept in an extremely ambiguous form of objectivity within still more entangled, doubled and tripled symbolism.

  Such works are, of course, to be found among his earlier pieces. For instance, 〈Arirang — Morning〉 of 1988 (fig. 1) lays out the front and side forms of the janggu drum in iconographic fashion, lining them up in a single row on the plane. From a certain angle this conveys a purely formal feeling like that of Jasper Johns's American flags—an iconographic form rid of cultural subject-consciousness, taken purely as an objective object. Likewise, the mosquito coil used as a plastic substitute for 〈Arirang〉 between 1991 and 1992 (fig. 2)—an object that condenses the artist's distinctive wit and decorative sense—shares the same conception. The visual form of "Arirang" with its subject-consciousness lifted out, paired with the sound of the word, somehow feels as though it should be curling and coiled; by substituting an industrial product utterly unrelated to the idea of "Arirang" with that image, the artist achieved an effect of neutralizing his own subjective subject-consciousness and plastic consciousness.

  Apart from a few such cases, his subject-consciousness was, in the past, perhaps too strongly exposed. Compared with that, this solo exhibition at Gallery Icon shows that the artist's objectivity—his way of approaching the subject and the form that holds it—has grown, and one can feel that the artist's intellectual seriousness in exploring subject and material has matured.

  Shin Jang-sik's interest in "what is our own," which began with the expression of folk paraphernalia (1988–90), has gradually moved toward a Koreanness as historical consciousness embodied in large, artificial structures (architectural forms) during 1991–92. Yet these structures inevitably exist in close relation with the surrounding nature, and the artist must have felt the urge to express nature itself in its bare-being. This appearance of nature usually takes the form of landscape, and the Eastern sansuhwa—the mountain-water painting—occupies a place quite distinct from the Western landscape in spiritual terms. The artist's turn, with 〈Mt. Geumgang〉 as its central subject in this solo exhibition, can be seen as a desire "to put into painting not the heavy, artificial, animal energy of structures, but some energy that approaches quietly, that is still and plant-like—yet within itself tense and full of vitality."

  I do not regard this shift in subject-consciousness—toward primarily plant-like images, including 〈Mt. Geumgang〉—as a result of a merely outward change of subject. While his formal vocabulary has not changed in stylistic terms, at least the artist's visual consciousness—the gaze that beholds "Koreanness," "tradition," or "folk character"—has matured and expanded to the point of distinguishing between the plant-like and the animal-like; this is, perhaps, an almost unconscious testimony that the room for the artist's objectivity toward any object of observation has correspondingly grown.

  This is also clearly visible in the motivation by which the artist resolved to paint 〈Mt. Geumgang〉. The feeling he received from seeing 〈The Painting of Mt. Geumgang〉 (fig. 3) by Gyeomjae Jeong Seon, in the collection of Korea University Museum and shown last year at the National Museum, along with Jeong's other "plant-like images," was, he says, scarcely different from what he had felt on seeing minhwa and folk paraphernalia. In other words, before the questions of subject or content, or the "Koreanness" and "traditionality" laid upon them, Jeong's sansuhwa came to him as a question of form and structure. Beyond the platitude that, hemmed within ideological bounds, one cannot even see—let alone paint—that famous landscape ("there is no Mt. Geumgang before a full stomach"), I believe the decisive motivation lay in the artist's visual independence and objectivity, which allowed him to observe Jeong Seon's sansuhwa from the standpoint of form and structure.

  As though uncovering historical fact, Shin Jang-sik gathers and compares visual materials of 〈Mt. Geumgang〉 from past and present that will be inscribed in his own mind, and gains the confidence to draw out a form of his own. Drawing, for instance, on the 〈Mt. Geumgang Photograph Album〉 from the colonial period (fig. 4) or the 〈Mt. Geumgang〉 footage filmed and broadcast on television by a women's delegation that visited the North last year (fig. 5), he excludes all narrative subject matter and seeks—much as in Jeong Seon's work—to present a structural form of mountain divided into countless facets and, through the artist's signature dripping technique that neutralizes the manifestness of that form, to bring forth a mountain of an auspicious feeling transcending eras.

  On the formal plane, where the previous works took frontality and symmetry as their structural skeleton, with decorative and iconographic elements emerging too prominently, these "plant-like images" markedly relax such elements. In the past, the structural frontality reinforced a certain austerity, and the symmetry added a tension to the picture plane, all consistent with the artist's subject-consciousness; but since the artist's subject-consciousness has shifted toward expressing in plastic form a plant-like energy that grows tough, that quietly holds an invisible inner strength, the elements that propped up iconography must in turn recede.

  In the end, where the narrative approach to subject was once a considerable burden, by pursuing the pure conceptuality of matter—and so working out the question of pure visual form as the question of conception itself—the artist will, I believe, come to encounter a new plastic vocabulary capable of bearing his transformed subject-consciousness.

  Open archive page →

• Mixed Review 1994-04 · Seo Jeong-geol

  Monthly Art Magazine, April 1994, "Reinterpreting Tradition, Expressing Life and Rhythm" — Seo Jeong-geol Critique (1994)

  Details

  Mixed Review 1994-04 · Seo Jeong-geol

  Monthly Art Magazine, April 1994, "Reinterpreting Tradition, Expressing Life and Rhythm" — Seo Jeong-geol Critique (1994)

  A recognition of the rhythm intrinsic to materials, and a practice of aligning one's own breath with that rhythm

  Shin Jang-sik's studio lies behind a quiet village on the border between Seoul and Seongnam. The village is thoroughly pastoral — rows of greenhouses growing flowers, low hills, and orchards spread across the landscape. He rents one bay of a slate-roofed building originally built as a factory, using it as his studio; the building, divided into six bays, is wholly leased to painters and forms a kind of collective studio. Besides Shin Jang-sik, Lee Gi-bong, Yoon Hae-nam, Jang Mun-geol, and Lee In-hee settled there early on, and Hong Seung-hye has recently joined. All of them are emerging artists drawing notice in the art world — what one might call rising figures.

  Although secluded from the city center, the place hums with the working energy of young artists. They even harbor an ambitious plan to open their studios soon and lay their work bare for view. As they exchange and cultivate their own worlds together, the place is filled with no ordinary heat — soon, it will be a topic in the art scene.

  An aerie of young artists, it is bound to harbor not only working passion but also a quiet undercurrent of competition. Shin Jang-sik, finishing his lectures at the university, comes straight here to immerse himself in painterly study. Somehow "study" or "inquiry" feels more apt than "work." His studio — the printing press, vessels holding pigments of every color, the print drying rack, the multi-function compressor brought in to make canvases by hand, the bowls of paper pulp — gives the impression of stepping into a laboratory.

  What he has been pursuing is the expression of rhythm. To express rhythm is to breathe life into a painting; when the picture plane brims with rhythm, the resonance a viewer feels before it grows richer. "Everything that lives carries rhythm," he holds, "and my task is to find the point where my own breath aligns with the rhythm of the materials." "At first my conscious intentions were strong, but gradually I came to perceive the rhythm of the materials themselves, and by working upon that recognition, new ideas emerged and the works gained vitality. … How dry and lifeless are works into which no life has been breathed?" In roughly these terms he began to describe his own artistic world. Concepts like vitality, rhythm, and movement form the foundation of his work. By setting aside calculated intention and following the rhythm of himself and his materials, the vitality inherent in nature and his own sensibility emerge of their own accord.

  Such recognition rests on long-standing aesthetic cores of traditional art. The traditional and folk subjects he frequently brings into his works function as conduits for realizing this aesthetic premise. The fact that the word "vitality" so often follows the names of traditional motifs — "Arirang," "cheongsachorong (blue-and-red silk lanterns)," and the like — in his work titles is not unrelated. Recently, his subjects have been moving from folk objects toward nature — proof of how deep and broad his exploration of tradition has grown. Even when he chooses nature as subject, he attends to objects rich in traditional resonance: the pine, the dandelion, the wild chrysanthemum, the cockscomb. The arrangement of the traditional, Korean nuance such subjects carry across the entire picture plane, together with the emphasis on a sense of movement — these are common features of his work. In technique, too, he employs a distinctive method that seems drawn from the conventions of traditional painting such as sansuhwa (mountain-water painting) and hwajohwa (flower-and-bird painting). Through the expression of thick, generous textures and through vivid color contrasts, he reaches toward the qualities of Korean beauty.

  The work of probing the essence of traditional beauty through the discovery of traditional images and sensibilities

  These ideas of his began to take shape around the mid-1980s. He served as assistant art director (under chief director Lee Man-ik, a Western-style painter) for the opening and closing ceremonies of the 1988 Seoul Olympics, in the course of which he collected an extensive body of folk material and was able to study deeply the formal qualities and content of traditional artifacts. The programs 〈The Procession of Drums〉, 〈Chaos〉, and 〈The Departing Boat〉 — which he conceived or participated in — were grounded in neunghaengdo (royal procession painting) and indigenous folk games. The props deployed were drawn from folk materials such as ceremonial flags and cheongsachorong. The waves of countless flags and the procession of blue-and-red lanterns made a profound impression on him. When such individual elements gathered into a totality, the rhythm and vitality radiating from them were etched deeply in his mind, and this became the foundation of his artistic world. "The flicker of light, the rhythm of color, the emotion of seeing them as one totality — this manner of drawing constitutes our native aesthetic and the very essence of our identity," he reflects. "Sensibility itself matters more than style or form, and what matters most is to reveal, with depth, the sensibility we share as a common thread."

  Another decisive moment that deepened his artistic world was his interest in woodblock printing. Producing woodblock prints, he says, he found that the relationship between the form carved into the wood and the wood's inherent qualities — its vitality and rhythm — had a great bearing on the work. "Meeting the wood, carving a form into it, and printing — when this act takes account of a sense of rhythm versus when it does not, the difference is subtle yet essential." In his telling, this finally returns to the question of how to hold within the depicted form not so much the appearance of the subject but rather the sensibility the subject carries together with the artist's own emotion.

  To bring rhythm to the picture plane, he has introduced techniques such as dripping and applying coarse string. The organic combination of forms bounded by winding lines, the thin, sharp lines scattered across the plane, and the powerful contrasts of color clearly convey his intent. The result of working with such principles and conceptions is precisely an inquiry into a new formal vocabulary that holds Korean sensibility intact.

  Monthly Art, April 1994

  

  

  

  

  Open archive page →

Related works

Self-Portrait

1976

28×41 cm · Oil on Canvas

Still Life

1976

73×61 cm · Oil on Canvas

Still Life

1976

130×97 cm · Oil on Canvas

Self-Portrait

1980

91×116.8 cm · Oil on Canvas

Work 80-1

1980

97×130 cm · Oil on Canvas

Tension 1 - From Chance

1981

40×20 cm · Drawing